The first time I beat GTA IV I tried to make moral decisions, such as letting people live, killing playboy x and francis mcreary.

This time around i am trying to be a cold blooded killer.

So, which ending is the more moral one, deal or revenge?
Which one would a cold blooded killer take?

The deal equals more money which a real evil person would take.

there both the same in a way but you chase after diffrent people

the moral of the stroy is

DONT FUCK WITH NIKO BELLIC

que que nah ya vas a comensar con tus pinches mamadas callate lo sico pendejo sbos rules bish!!!!!!!!!!!!!


answer my q's and ill give u ten points

They're both evil in a way:

Deal you get more money (greed is the evil here)

and

Kill you are more directly an evil person

In the end, neither are something that should be done in real life, but I say you do the EXACT opposite playing the game second time round--it feels almost as if you're playing an entirely different game (instead of guns blazing, using stealth, etc)

It depends. If you want more money, you have to take the nice guy way. But if you want to feel like an assassin, then you should just kill the people your suppose to.

Do the deal mission, it is much more evil cuz Roman dies from your greed

I just killed all the bad people, playboy, dimitri and i forget the rest, and my girlfriend dies or something, it was a long time ago though, lul